Today's Health Tips
Freaky New Food Ingredients Are Turning Up in Your Food, Watchdog Group Finds
Food ingredients definitely not worth eating are hiding out in your favorite foods, a new investigation uncovers.
In just the past few months, we've learned many
Americans are unknowingly eating a plastic yoga mat chemical routinely
used in bread and had the news that trans fats once thought "safe" are
causing 20,000 heart attacks a year. But recent food-safety politics
don't end there. A new investigation from a national watchdog group just
identified a gaping loophole that's allowing hundreds of new and
questionable chemicals into the food supply, possibly endangering public
health.
According to Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), some food
companies are using a loophole in the Food Additives Amendment of 1958
allowing manufacturers to hire their own experts—sometimes their own
employees—to perform safety reviews of new chemical food ingredients.
Many are using their own tests to say that a new food ingredient meets
the "generally recognized as safe," or GRAS, requirement of the law.
Companies aren't even required to submit the company-sponsored safety
data to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for review.
That's right, companies are allowed to determine if an
ingredient is safe before pumping it into processed foods. Can you say
conflict of interest? Ultimately, Congress has final power in closing
the loophole that lives in the federal GRAS law. Until then, NRDC is
asking the FDA to limit the activity, urging the federal agency to
require a mandatory alert if a company is self-approving a new chemical
to be used in food.
The problem stems from an outdated law that doesn't align with the
modern world's level of chemical development for new food ingredients.
Originally passed in 1958, NRDC says the exemption was designed to
prevent a lengthy FDA approval process for common ingredients like
vinegar and vegetable oil—things generally recognized as safe in the
scientific community. Decades later, companies are using the exemption
loophole to approve hundreds—or even thousands—of new chemicals to be
used as food ingredients, NRDC says.
Here are some other key findings from the report:
• Currently, 275 chemicals used by 56 companies appear to be marketed
as GRAS and used in many food products based on the companies' own
safety determinations.
• When FDA does catch wind of a chemical proposed for use in food,
the agency often asks tough questions, according to information NRDC
received through a Freedom of Information Act request. Under the
loophole, companies aren't required to answer them and may continue to
sell the chemical for use in food.
• Companies have sometimes certified their chemicals as safe for use
in food despite potentially serious allergic reactions or adverse
reactions in combination with common drugs.
• If a company does take the voluntary step to have FDA review its
safety data, it's able to withdraw the request if it appears the FDA
might reject it.
That seems to be what happened in four NRDC case studies. FDA had
serious concerns about these four ingredients' safety, but they went on
to be marketed to the public anyway:
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)
A company
determined it as safe for use in beverages including teas, sport drinks,
and juices, despite FDA's citation of evidence that it may cause
leukemia in fetuses in human cell tests. Animal studies showed it
affects the thyroid, testes, spleen, pituitary, liver, and
gastrointestinal tract.
Gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)
A company
determined it as safe for use in beverages, chewing gum, coffee, tea,
and candy, despite FDA concerns that estimated exposure was much higher
than what the company itself considered safe.
Sweet lupin protein, fiber, and flour
A company
determined it as safe for use in baked goods, dairy products, gelatin,
meats, and candy, despite FDA-raised questions about whether the
chemicals would cause serious allergic reactions in those with peanut
allergies.
Theobromine
A company determined as safe for use
in bread, cereal, beverages, chewing gum, tea, soy milk, gelatin, candy,
and yogurt and fruit smoothies, even though FDA thought the amount
people would actually eat could be five times higher than the safe
consumption level reported by the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment